Curiosity
Curiosity: The Investigative Instinct That Tools Don't Have
Effective OSINT work does not start with tools. It starts with a question. Skilled investigators rarely stumble into discoveries. Instead, they ask questions others never thought to raise. They look beyond what seems obvious and stay with a problem longer than most people would. This habit has a name. It is curiosity.
Curiosity in digital investigations does not mean idle interest. It refers to a focused drive to learn, uncover, and explore. It provides the reason to click one more link, run one more reverse image search, or examine a domain registration just a little longer. While tools can identify signals and retrieve data, only a curious mind will recognize what matters and follow it where it leads.
What Curiosity Looks Like in OSINT Work
You might recognize curiosity when an investigator asks, “What else could explain this?” or says, “This doesn’t add up yet.” You might see it when someone refuses to accept the first correlation as conclusive or returns to an old lead that never felt resolved.
Consider This Example:
An analyst identifies a suspicious Twitter account. The account uses a familiar naming convention and shares content aligned with known influence operations. It also received early amplification from previously flagged bot accounts. A tool might immediately link it to a known network.
A curious analyst will pause. They will ask:
Why does the account follow that naming pattern?
Why did it wait three days after creation to begin engagement?
Why did it avoid using recycled infrastructure?
That line of questioning uncovers strategy. It reveals timing, deception tactics, and risk management. The analyst moves from observing a symptom to understanding a method.
Why Curiosity Drives Deeper Analysis
Curiosity allows investigators to resist premature conclusions. It shifts the focus from rapid answers to better questions. Tools may suggest links, but curiosity prompts a person to validate them. Without curiosity, an analyst becomes a technician. With it, they become an investigator.
Research supports this distinction. Studies from neuroscience show that curiosity activates the brain’s reward circuits. It prepares the brain to absorb information more effectively and improves memory retention (Gruber et al., 2014; Kang et al., 2009). As Julie Pham and Mikaila Culverson note in their white paper, curiosity requires vulnerability. The curious person admits they do not know and takes the risk of asking anyway.
In the context of OSINT, this vulnerability opens up deeper insight. It invites challenge and uncertainty. It keeps the investigator present with the problem and willing to revisit assumptions.
How to Develop Curiosity as a Skill
Curiosity does not belong to personality. It belongs to practice. Analysts can train it the same way they train for sourcing or geolocation. According to the UNODC’s “Science of Skills” framework, curiosity improves learning speed, memory, critical thinking, and decision-making. It also contributes to empathy and resilience.
Several strategies support curiosity development:
Slow down initial conclusions. Take the time to ask, “What else could this be?”
Reframe problems as questions. Shift from “What is this?” to “Why is this here?” or “How might this behave differently?”
Keep a question log. Track unresolved questions rather than rushing to close a case. Revisit them with new information.
Use the Three Why Method. For any observation, ask “Why?” three times to uncover deeper motivations or behaviors.
Practice question-storming. Many analytical frameworks encourage generating questions before identifying a path forward. This approach supports divergent thinking and reduces bias. Check out our post on the Starbursting Technique for a walk-through!
Organizational Gaps Around Curiosity
Despite its value, many workplaces fail to support curiosity. Francesca Gino’s Harvard Business Review research showed that although most executives claim to value curiosity, less than a quarter of employees report feeling encouraged to ask questions at work.
This culture gap has implications for OSINT. Environments that emphasize speed, efficiency, and certainty can suppress the very instincts that produce breakthroughs. Leaders must model curiosity by tolerating uncertainty, supporting exploration, and celebrating questions that challenge the status quo.
How Curious Analysts Add Value
Curiosity leads investigators to:
Re-examine assumptions that others overlook
Identify inconsistencies in adversary behavior
Uncover deeper motives or strategies behind online operations
Map threat infrastructure that standard tools cannot link on their own
It turns surface indicators into strategic insights. It transforms static profiles into dynamic threat assessments. Curiosity bridges the space between data and meaning.
What Curiosity Demands from Leaders and Teams
Leaders who want to cultivate curiosity must do more than say they value it. They must create space for it. This includes:
Encouraging team members to ask questions during case reviews
Allowing time in workflows for exploration and pivots
Supporting lateral investigations that do not immediately pay off
Framing mistakes as part of discovery, not failure
Julie Pham suggests that curiosity resembles meditation. It looks simple, but demands discipline. It thrives in environments that promote trust, self-awareness, and intentional communication.
Final Thoughts
Curiosity starts every great OSINT case. It sustains every major discovery. It guides analysts when the trail grows cold and the evidence seems flat. It brings energy, insight, and persistence to a field that often rewards repetition and speed.
Tools can highlight correlations. But only a curious mind will ask, “Why this? Why now? Why like that?” That line of questioning opens up new layers of truth. It uncovers motivations, reveals deception, and strengthens attribution.
If we want stronger OSINT professionals, we must train them to ask—not just search. We must teach them to follow doubt, frame better questions, and keep their sense of wonder alive.
Because in this work, success depends not just on what we find, but on how much we care to look beyond it.